FASHION /
WOMEN
March 6, 2015
Ryuichi Sakamoto | Part 13: A Definitive Statement on "Art"
Ryuichi Sakamoto | Part 13: Declaring on "Art"
The Professor's own answers resolve everything! A declaration from on high.
With the album "UTAU" released on November 10th, the Tokyo International Forum performances are finally here on December 10th and 11th! The "Everything" Declaration series restarts to commemorate the tour!
Answer = Ryuichi SakamotoPhoto by JAMANDFIX

Nice to meet you. I'm currently studying art at a university (focusing on research and production, not creation). The university professor says artists are needed in society, but I don't think so at all. I believe what's truly needed isn't artists, but the ability to think deeply about things, the relationship between oneself and others, and how to survive within the environment surrounding Japanese art. However, students around me who are focused on creation stop thinking, believing that 'it's enough to become an artist.'
Professor Sakamoto, do you have any conditions for being an artist? And do you think art and artists are necessary for society going forward?
I look forward to your reply.

Go your own way, regardless of societal needs.
Art is not necessary for society; it is superfluous.
Therefore, trying to become an artist that society needs is the height of folly.
Artists must be outsiders, and one becomes an artist because one wants to, not because society has any need for it.
Art is used for ecology, to alleviate poverty... but there's no more absurd notion. I believe that's brainwashing through art and music, and that art should not be used as propaganda.
I recently read the book "Sade, Goya, Mozart" (by Gwy Salles, translated by Kei Takahashi, Hayakawa Publishing) and realized that these three men were alive during the storming of the Bastille on July 14, 1789, though in different places.
Until the collapse of the monarchy and the old regime during the French Revolution, art forms like music and painting developed under the patronage of the powers that be – the church, royalty, and nobility, essentially the wealthy. This continued through the bourgeoisie and, while transforming into modern corporations and paying consumers, persists to this day.
In other words, for a long period, up to the absolute monarchy, 'craftsman' and 'artist' had the same meaning; they were employed by the wealthy, and no one questioned it. The idea of 'doing something for art' is very recent, only emerging around the time of the French Revolution as society began to change.
Paradoxically, art only flourishes where there is wealth.
Therefore, go your own way, regardless of societal needs.
There are no conditions for being an artist, and the very idea of studying art at school is fundamentally flawed from the start.
Questions for the Professor Wanted!
Please send in your worries about work or family, questions for the Professor, and more.
Ryuichi Sakamoto will declare his views from on high.
【How to Ask】
Click the "ask sakamoto !" button below.
On the page that opens, enter your email address in the "Reply Address" and "Confirmation Address" fields, write your question in the "Content" field, and press the "Send" button to complete.
